Future of Work
JPMorgan Employees Push Back with Petition Against RTO Mandate
Dan Bladen
CEO & Co-Founder
JPMorgan Chase offices in New York and London. A hand signing a petition.
Get started with Kadence

See Kadence in action and start your free trial today!

Try For Free

JPMorgan Chase employees are fighting back, launching a petition to stop the company’s strict five-day return-to-office (RTO) mandate. The petition calls for JPMorgan to retain (or return to):

  • the flexible hybrid-working model for roles that have already used it—regardless of rank,

  • invest resources to expand hybrid-eligibility to more job categories,

  • and allow remote-capable workers to work from any JPMC corporate office in their region.

This isn’t just another case of workers resisting change; it’s a pivotal moment that underscores the growing disconnect between leadership expectations and employee realities in the hybrid work era.

The Petition: A Stand for Professional Dignity

The petition has quickly gained traction among JPMorgan employees. It’s more than just a plea to work from home—it’s a powerful statement about autonomy, productivity, and respect in the workplace. As the petition states:

“The recent mandate for 100% in-office work is a great leap backward: It hurts employees, customers, shareholders, and the firm’s reputation.”

Employees argue that the mandate disrupts work-life balance, increases commuting costs, and dismisses the lessons learned during the pandemic. It goes on to say that: “From a corporate-citizenship perspective, it worsens traffic and pollution while disproportionately pushing out women, caregivers, senior employees, and individuals with disabilities. Many of these are top performers, and many of them only able to join the workforce under hybrid work rules.”

JPMorgan Chase Offices, Washington D.C. Source: InteriorDesign

As one signatory points out:

“My team is spread out through two continents and three time zones. JPMC is a global company–why can’t that include my home office?”
The Data Doesn’t Lie: Productivity and Profitability in Hybrid Work

What makes this petition particularly compelling is its direct reference to academic research, notably the work of Stanford economist Nick Bloom. The petition cites:

“Studies consistently show that remote work delivers proven results on productivity, including reducing turnover and increasing profits as retaining seniority is important.”

Bloom’s A/B test study on hybrid work, published in Harvard Business Review, reinforces this point. The research revealed that hybrid models not only maintain productivity but also enhance employee satisfaction and reduce attrition rates.

Specifically, the study found no significant difference in productivity between employees working hybrid and those in the office full-time. However, employees in hybrid models reported higher satisfaction levels and experienced a 35% lower attrition rate compared to their fully in-office counterparts. These aren’t just theoretical findings—they reflect the real-world experiences of companies that have embraced flexible work arrangements and reaped measurable benefits.

JPMorgan’s Own Success Story

Ironically, JPMorgan’s record profits during the pandemic years are a testament to the effectiveness of hybrid work. As the petition highlights:

“During the years since COVID lockdowns began, JPMC employees’ work has continuously produced record profits for the bank—all while working from home and from the office in a hybrid manner.”

This raises a critical question: if hybrid work has been so successful, why the sudden shift to a rigid, full-time office model?

The Bigger Picture: Control vs. Trust

At its core, this debate isn’t just about where work happens—it’s about how companies view their employees. Mandates often stem from a desire for control, rooted in outdated notions that productivity requires physical presence. But the pandemic shattered that myth, proving that trust and autonomy can drive results just as effectively, if not more so.

As we discussed in our recent Kadence article, rigid RTO policies risk alienating top talent and stifling the very innovation companies need to thrive in today’s dynamic environment.

Another signatory notes:

“Hybrid allows working moms to have a career and be present for children. RTO is forcing me to choose. Also, the roll out of this has been so messy and demeaning to employees.”
What Companies Can Learn from This

JPMorgan’s situation is a cautionary tale for leaders everywhere. Here are three key takeaways:

  1. Listen to Your Employees: The petition reflects genuine concerns about well-being, productivity, and respect. Ignoring these voices can lead to disengagement and higher turnover.

  2. Trust the Data: Research consistently shows the benefits of hybrid work. Companies that embrace flexibility often see gains in both performance and employee satisfaction.

  3. Flexibility is the Future: Hybrid work isn’t a trend; it’s a strategic advantage. Organizations that adapt will attract and retain top talent in an increasingly competitive landscape.
How Kadence Can Help

At Kadence, we understand the complexities of managing hybrid teams. Our platform is designed to help companies create flexible, efficient, and employee-centric work environments. By enabling smarter space utilization and fostering collaboration, Kadence empowers organizations to thrive in the hybrid era.

The JPMorgan petition is more than just a protest—it’s a wake-up call. The future of work is here, and it’s flexible. The question is: will companies embrace it or get left behind?

Ready to future-proof your workplace? Book a demo with Kadence today and discover how we can help your team thrive in the hybrid era.


Related Article
Airbnb's Headquarters. Internal and external views
Future of Work
Gathering Weeks: Airbnb’s Innovative Hybrid Strategy
Future of Work
The Future of Work in 2025 And Beyond With Nick Bloom
Future of Work
The Federal Government’s Optimizing Office Cuts